NRG™ Transseptal Needle
Be Precise. Save Time.™
Improve crossing success rates1-3 and reduce procedure time3,4 with the revolutionary radiofrequency transseptal needle.
The standard for left heart access.
Using radiofrequency energy for your transseptal puncture saves time,3,4 reduces the rate of serious complications,1-6 and increases success rates as compared to mechanical alternatives.
Successfully cross difficult anatomies.1 Cross aneurysmal septa while reducing excessive tenting,3 and fibrotic septa while reducing mechanical force.2
Reduce the rate of serious complications attributed to transseptal puncture, with the use of a radiofrequency needle.1,3-6
Cross the septum at precise locations. Fine tune your position with the rounded atraumatic tip prior to RF delivery.
Experience a shorter, more predictable transseptal puncture time.2-4 Reduce fluoroscopy time for transseptal puncture.3,5
Visualize the Needle
Locate the RF needle on your mapping system. Visualize the tip’s exact location with a radiopaque marker during fluoroscopy.
Reduce skiving risk when advancing through the sheath and dilator, with a rounded atraumatic tip.†,5,7
‡ All clinical claims in this section are supported by published literature; some claims are supported by study designs other than randomized controlled trials.
† In vitro study simulating transseptal catheterizations. Any particles generated from advancement of the transseptal needles through the sheath and dilator were collected and analyzed.
||56 cm, 71 cm, 89 cm, 98 cm
|Compatible Transseptal Sheaths
|6F small anatomy fixed curve - 48 cm
|8F or 8.5F fixed curve - 63 cm
|8.5F fixed curve - 81 cm
|8.5F steerable curve - 71 cm
Compatible with 0.032” dilator systems; *proximal gauge 19 ga, distal gauge 22 ga
Browse content specific to this product, such as brochures, publications, white papers, IFUs, videos and other product information.
If you require an in-service training session or a follow up visit from one of our representatives, please contact us.
- Comparison of a radiofrequency powered flexible needle with a classic rigid brockenbrough needle for transseptal punctures in terms of safety and efficacy Jauvert G, et al. Heart Lung Circ. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2014.07.073
- Randomized trial of conventional transseptal needle versus radiofrequency energy needle puncture for left atrial access (the TRAVERSE-LA Study) Hsu JC, et al. J Am Heart Assoc. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000428
- Prospective comparison between conventional transseptal puncture and transseptal needle puncture with radiofrequency energy Fromentin S, et al. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. doi: 10.1007/s10840-011-9564-2
- The use of a radiofrequency needle improves the safety and efficacy of transseptal puncture for atrial fibrillation ablation Winkle RA, et al. Heart Rhythm. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.04.032
- Feasibility and safety of transseptal puncture procedures for radiofrequency catheter ablation in small children weighing below 30 kg: Single-centre experience Yoshida S, et al. Europace. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv383
- Particle formation and risk of embolization during transseptal catheterization: Comparison of standard transseptal needles and a new radiofrequency transseptal needle Feld GK, et al. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. doi: 10.1007/s10840-010-9531-3
- Initial experience using a radiofrequency powered transseptal needle Smelley MP, et al. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01656.x
Thank you for subscription!